A modern hull is one continuous piece of steel because it is welded. That continuity is what makes the ship light and watertight — and it is why a joint the size of a fingernail can matter to the whole structure.
Riveting built ships for a century. Welding replaced it because a welded joint is lighter, inherently watertight, faster to make, and suited to building a hull as blocks in a shop rather than plate by plate on a berth. A butt-welded seam is flush; a riveted one needs overlapping plates, a row of holes and a caulked edge.
But the same property that makes welding attractive creates its one great liability. A riveted structure is discontinuous: a crack running through a plate stops when it reaches the joint. A welded structure is continuous, so a crack has an uninterrupted path through the whole ship. The all-welded ship failures of the 1940s were this lesson learned at cost, and the modern answers — notch-tough steel grades, crack arrest design, fatigue detailing, and the entire apparatus of procedure and welder qualification — all descend from it.
Welding makes the hull one piece. That is its whole advantage and its whole risk, and every rule in this chapter exists to keep the advantage while managing the risk.
Three things are being controlled at every joint, and it is worth naming them before going further: the metallurgy of the metal after it has been melted and cooled, the geometry of the joint including the shape of the toe where fatigue starts, and the residual stress and distortion left behind when the weld shrinks. Almost every requirement you will meet is aimed at one of the three.
The syllabus lists many processes; a shipyard uses a handful, and each has a natural home decided by deposition rate, position capability and access.
| Process | How it works | Where it is used | Watch for |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMAW Manual metal arc, "stick" | Flux-covered electrode; the covering forms gas and slag | Repairs, tacks, awkward access, small runs anywhere | Low deposition, frequent stops; electrodes must be baked and stored dry |
| GMAW / MIG-MAG | Solid wire, continuous feed, shielding gas | Thinner plate, robotic fillet welding, workshop work | Draughts blow the shielding away; risk of lack of fusion at low heat |
| FCAW Flux cored | Tubular wire filled with flux; slag supports the pool | Most positional work on blocks and at erection joints | Slag must be cleaned between runs; choose basic wire where toughness matters |
| SAW Submerged arc | Arc buried under granular flux; very high current | Panel line butts and long seams, flat or near-flat only | Flat positions only — the flux falls off; deep penetration means high dilution |
| GTAW / TIG | Non-consumable tungsten electrode, inert gas | Pipe root runs, stainless, aluminium, high-quality small work | Slow and expensive; used where quality outranks speed |
| ESW / EGW Electroslag, electrogas | Vertical, single-pass, very high heat input | Thick vertical butts, erection joints on large blocks | Very high heat input; coarse HAZ, so toughness must be demonstrated |
| Stud welding | Arc drawn between stud and plate, then forged | Insulation pins, deck fittings, cable hangers | Surface preparation; a failed stud leaves a hard spot |
| Laser hybrid | Laser keyhole plus an arc | Panel lines in advanced yards | Very low distortion and high speed; demands tight fit-up |
Two practical patterns are worth carrying into an interview. First, deposition rate decides where a process lives: SAW deposits several times what a manual process can, so the yard arranges the work to keep it flat rather than the other way round. Second, one-sided welding with ceramic or flux backing has become standard on panel lines, because turning a 20-metre panel over to back-gouge and weld the second side costs crane time, floor space and schedule.
Five joint types cover nearly everything on a ship: butt, tee, lap, corner and edge. The tee joint welded with fillets on both sides is the workhorse — every stiffener on every plate is one.
Edge preparation exists so the arc can reach the root. The choice is a compromise between access and volume, and the volume matters more than beginners expect, because weld metal is consumable cost, arc time, shrinkage and distortion all at once.
Positions are lettered because qualification depends on them. In the ISO scheme PA is flat, PB horizontal-vertical, PC horizontal, PF vertical up, PG vertical down and PE overhead; the AWS equivalents are 1G to 4G for butts and 1F to 4F for fillets. Qualifying in a harder position generally covers the easier ones — which is why yards test welders vertically and overhead rather than flat.
Fit-up governs the result more than any other single factor. Excess root gap means more weld metal, more shrinkage and a greater chance of burn-through; too little means the root is never fused. Misalignment at a butt creates an eccentricity that turns a tensile load into a local bending stress at the joint, which is why IACS Rec 47 tabulates alignment tolerances rather than leaving them to judgement.
A weld symbol is a compact instruction, and being unable to read one is a visible gap in an interview.
The symbol hangs off a reference line with an arrow pointing at the joint. In the ISO convention, a symbol drawn below the reference line applies to the arrow side of the joint; one drawn above the dashed identification line applies to the other side. The AWS convention places arrow-side symbols below the line and other-side symbols above it, without the dashed line — so the first thing to establish is which standard the drawing follows.
So a triangle carrying 6 on its left and 50 (150) on its right, with a circle at the kink, reads: a 6 mm fillet, intermittent, 50 mm of weld every 150 mm, all the way round the joint. Whether that 6 is a leg or a throat depends on the standard and on the drawing's notes — and asking that question is the correct instinct.
Intermittent fillet welding saves consumable and distortion on lightly loaded connections, but each start and stop is a potential defect and a fatigue site, and it is not permitted in tanks or in way of corrosive service where the unwelded gap would trap water.
Everything metallurgical in this chapter follows from one quantity.
Heat input sets the cooling rate, and cooling rate sets the microstructure. The usual measure is t8/5, the time taken to cool from 800 °C to 500 °C, because that is the range in which the transformation happens.
This is why heat input is not a free choice but a qualified variable with a range, and why high heat input welding has its own treatment: above about 50 kJ/cm for most steels, and above about 35 kJ/cm for quenched and tempered steels of 420 N/mm² yield and above.
Hydrogen cracking needs four things simultaneously — hydrogen, a susceptible microstructure, tensile stress and a temperature below roughly 150 °C — and the practical controls map onto each: low-hydrogen consumables kept dry, preheat and controlled heat input, reduced restraint and sensible sequence. Because the cracking is delayed, final NDT on higher strength steel is deliberately held back after welding rather than done immediately.
Carbon equivalent is the shorthand for how much trouble a steel will give. The higher it is, the more readily the HAZ hardens, and the more preheat the joint needs.
Learn these as a set of three columns rather than a list of names — an interviewer will always ask for the cause and the cure, not the definition.
| Defect | Cause | Found by | Cure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Undercut | Current too high, travel too fast, wrong electrode angle | Visual, MT | Reduce current, slow down, correct angle; grind and reweld |
| Porosity | Damp or dirty surface, damp consumable, lost gas shield, long arc | RT, visual if surface-breaking | Clean and dry; bake electrodes; screen from draughts |
| Slag inclusion | Poor interrun cleaning, wrong bead placement, excessive weave | RT, UT | Clean between runs; stringer beads; correct sequence |
| Lack of fusion | Too little heat, wrong angle, narrow preparation | UT (planar — RT may miss it) | Increase heat input, open the preparation, correct technique |
| Incomplete penetration | Root gap or root face wrong, current too low, no back-gouge | UT, RT | Correct fit-up; back-gouge and weld the second side |
| Hot (solidification) cracking | Deep narrow bead, high sulphur, high restraint | Visual, MT, RT | Wider, shallower beads; cleaner consumable; reduce restraint |
| Cold (hydrogen) cracking | Hydrogen + hard HAZ + stress, below ~150 °C. Delayed | MT, UT — after a delay | Low-hydrogen consumables, preheat, control heat input |
| Lamellar tearing | Through-thickness tensile stress on inclusion-bearing plate | UT | Z-quality plate (UR W14), redesign the joint, butter the surface |
| Overlap / excess cap | Too much filler, too slow, poor technique | Visual, gauge | Grind to a smooth toe — the sharp toe angle is the fatigue risk |
One distinction is worth stating explicitly, because it separates a good answer from an average one. Planar defects — cracks, lack of fusion, incomplete penetration — are far more dangerous than volumetric ones such as porosity, because a sharp flaw concentrates stress and behaves like a crack from day one. That is also why UT, which finds planar flaws, matters more on a hull than RT, which is better at volumetric ones.
Weld metal is deposited molten and shrinks as it cools. Because the shrinkage is restrained by cold metal around it, the result is always some combination of residual stress and movement.
The controls, in the order a yard applies them:
Note the direction of the list. The cheapest control is the one applied at the drawing board — a smaller weld — and the most expensive is the one applied after the fact. An interviewer asking about distortion is usually checking whether the candidate reaches for line heating first or last.
Nothing structural is welded on a classed ship without an approved procedure and a qualified welder. The chain has three documents and it is examined constantly.
The qualification covers a range, not a single joint, and the boundaries of that range are the essential variables: process, steel grade and group, thickness range, joint type, welding position, consumable and its classification, heat input range, preheat and interpass temperature, and shielding gas. Step outside any one of them and the joint is no longer covered.
Under IACS UR W28 — completely revised to Rev.3 in September 2025 and applying to new qualification tests from 1 January 2027 — a butt weld test assembly is examined non-destructively over its whole length, then sectioned for two transverse tensile tests, four bend tests, Charpy V-notch impacts at defined notch positions, a macro examination and, for steels of 355 N/mm² yield and above, hardness testing.
Welder qualification is separate and personal. IACS UR W32 sets the scheme for welders of hull structural steels: a test weld in a stated position and material group, with a range of validity for position, thickness, joint type and process — and a validity that lapses if the welder stops using the process. The two questions in any audit are always the same: is there an approved WPS for this joint, and is the person holding the torch qualified for it?
Inspection begins before the arc is struck. Fit-up, alignment, root gap, cleanliness, preheat and consumable condition are all checked first, because none of them can be corrected afterwards without cutting the weld out.
| Method | Finds | Strengths | Limits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Visual (VT) | Profile, undercut, overlap, surface cracks | Immediate, cheap, catches most workmanship faults | Surface only; depends on the inspector |
| Magnetic particle (MT) | Surface and near-surface flaws | Very sensitive to tight cracks; fast | Ferromagnetic materials only |
| Dye penetrant (PT) | Surface-breaking flaws only | Works on aluminium and stainless | Nothing subsurface; surface must be clean |
| Ultrasonic (UT) | Internal flaws, with depth | Best for planar defects; one-sided access; no radiation | Operator skill; surface condition; no permanent image unless recorded |
| Radiographic (RT) | Internal volumetric flaws | Permanent record, easy to interpret | Radiation control; poor at tight planar defects; thickness limits |
| Phased array / TOFD | Internal flaws, imaged and recorded | Recordable, repeatable, high coverage | Setup and qualification effort; covered by UR W34 |
Acceptance is against a stated standard, and in shipbuilding that is normally IACS Recommendation No. 47, the Shipbuilding and Repair Quality Standard — the document yards and owners write into the building contract for alignment, gaps, undercut, profile and distortion tolerances, at both a standard and a limit value. The current edition is Rev.10, with a corrigendum issued in October 2025.
Two habits separate a competent inspector from a box-ticker. An indication is not automatically a defect — it must be compared against the criteria for that joint. And a rejectable indication is a question before it is a repair: one isolated pore in a long seam is a different problem from lack of fusion recurring on the same shift.
The International Association of Classification Societies issues Unified Requirements (URs), which member societies incorporate into their own rules, and Recommendations (Recs), which carry weight through contracts rather than through class. These are the ones that touch welding.
| Reference | Title | What it is used for |
|---|---|---|
| UR W11 | Normal and higher strength hull structural steels | The grades themselves — A, B, D, E and AH/DH/EH — with chemistry, mechanical properties and impact requirements |
| UR W13 | Thickness tolerances of steel plates and wide flats | How much under-thickness is acceptable as rolled |
| UR W14 | Plates and wide flats with specified through-thickness properties (Z quality) | The answer to lamellar tearing at restrained T and corner joints |
| UR W16 | High strength steels for welded structures | Higher-strength grades beyond the normal hull range; revised alongside W28 |
| UR W17 | Approval of consumables for welding normal and higher strength hull structural steels | Why you cannot simply buy any electrode — consumables are approved by grade and process |
| UR W23 | Approval of welding consumables for high strength steels | The same scheme extended to the higher-strength grades |
| UR W25 | Aluminium alloys for hull construction and marine structures | Grades and properties for aluminium hulls and superstructures |
| UR W26 | Requirements for welding consumables for aluminium alloys | Consumable approval on the aluminium side |
| UR W28 | Welding procedure qualification tests of steels for hull construction and marine structures | The core welding UR: what a procedure test consists of and what its range of approval covers. Rev.3, September 2025, applying to new tests from 1 January 2027 |
| UR W31 | YP47 steels and brittle crack arrest steels | Very high strength thick deck plating on large container ships, and crack arrest capability |
| UR W32 | Qualification scheme for welders of hull structural steels | Welder approval: test, range of validity, and how it lapses |
| UR W33 | Non-destructive testing of ship hull steel welds | Which method, what extent, and what is acceptable |
| UR W34 | Advanced non-destructive testing of materials and welds | Phased array ultrasonics and time-of-flight diffraction |
| Rec. 47 | Shipbuilding and Repair Quality Standard | The workmanship tolerances a yard is actually held to. Rev.10 Corr.1, October 2025 |
Revision numbers move. Where a figure matters — a tolerance, a test requirement, an implementation date — check the current resolution on the IACS website rather than a summary, including this one.
W11, W16 and W25 are the materials. W17, W23 and W26 are the consumables. W28 and W32 are the qualifications — procedure and person. W33 and W34 are the inspection. Rec 47 is the workmanship standard. Five groups, and every welding requirement falls into one of them.
Three calculations that come up in examinations, in design offices and in interviews.
A submerged arc butt weld is made at 600 A and 30 V with a travel speed of 45 cm/min. Take the thermal efficiency of SAW as 1.0. (a) Find the heat input in kJ/mm and kJ/cm. (b) The welder slows to 20 cm/min to fill a wide gap — recompute, and say whether the procedure has become high heat input welding under IACS UR W28.
I = 600 A, V = 30 V, η = 1.0 (SAW) v = 45 cm/min, then 20 cm/min UR W28: high heat input is above 50 kJ/cm
(a) Find the heat input in kJ/mm and kJ/cm
Convert the travel speed to mm/s.
Because heat input is quoted per unit length of weld.
Arc power is simply volts times amps.
Corrected for the fraction of it that actually enters the joint.
Heat input is that power divided by how fast the arc moves along.
Part (b): the same arc.
Moving at less than half the speed, puts more than twice the heat into each millimetre of joint.
Compare against the threshold in UR W28.
| Travel speed | v (mm/s) | Q (kJ/mm) | Q (kJ/cm) | Classification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 45 cm/min | 7.50 | 2.4 | 24 | normal |
| 20 cm/min | 3.33 | 5.4 | 54 | high heat input |
So a change nobody wrote down.
A welder slowing the carriage to cope with a wide gap — has taken the joint outside the qualified procedure and into a category with its own approval requirements. The consequence is metallurgical: more heat means a slower cooling rate, a wider heat affected zone and coarser grain, and on higher strength steel that costs toughness.
Answer(a) 2.4 kJ/mm = 24 kJ/cm. (b) 5.4 kJ/mm = 54 kJ/cm — now high heat input
The trap: mixing kJ/mm and kJ/cm. Class thresholds are written in kJ/cm, most WPS forms are filled in kJ/mm, and the factor of ten between them is the difference between a compliant procedure and an unqualified one.
A bracket transmits 180 kN in shear into a 12 mm deck plate through two fillet welds, each 350 mm long. The allowable shear stress on the weld throat is 115 N/mm². Find the leg length required for strength, and compare it with the rule minimum.
F = 180 kN, two welds each 350 mm long τ_allow = 115 N/mm² Plate thickness t = 12 mm Throat a = 0.7 × leg z
Find the leg length required for strength, and compare it with the rule minimum
Find the throat area the load demands.
Divide by the total length of weld available.
Both welds carry the load, so the effective length is twice 350 mm.
Convert throat to leg.
For an equal-leg fillet the throat is the perpendicular from the root to the hypotenuse, which is the leg divided by √2.
Now compare with the rule minimum.
Which for a 12 mm plate is of the order of 0.4t.
So the answer is a 5 mm leg.
And the static calculation never came into it. That is the general case in ship structures: fillet sizes are set by classification rule minima, by the plate thickness they must not undermatch, and by fatigue — very rarely by a static strength check.
A second check worth making in an interview answer.
An oversized fillet is not a free safety margin. Weld metal volume goes as the square of the leg, so going from 5 mm to 8 mm costs 2.6 times the consumable, the arc time and the distortion, for a joint that was already strong enough.
Answerz = 3.2 mm by strength, but the 5 mm rule minimum governs
The trap: quoting the strength answer and stopping. A 3 mm fillet on a 12 mm plate would never be accepted — it fails the rule minimum, it is a fatigue liability, and it cools too fast on thick plate, which invites hydrogen cracking.
A 12 m seam joins 20 mm plate with a double-V butt: 60° included angle, 3 mm root face, 3 mm root gap, and a cap about 1.5 mm high on each side. Deposition rate is 6 kg/h and the operating factor is 40 %. Find the weld metal mass, the arc time and the elapsed time. Take the density of steel as 7.85 g/cm³.
L = 12 m, t = 20 mm, double-V, 60° included Root face 3 mm, root gap 3 mm, cap 1.5 mm each side Deposition 6 kg/h, operating factor 0.40, ρ = 7.85 g/cm³
Find the weld metal mass, the arc time and the elapsed time
Work out the cross-sectional area of the groove in three parts: the two V's.
The gap running through the joint, and the caps proud of the surface. Start with the depth of each V.
Each V is a triangle whose half-angle is 30°.
Its area is h²·tan θ.
The root gap is a rectangle running the full plate thickness.
The caps sit above and below the plate surface.
Approximate each as a parabolic segment, two thirds of its bounding rectangle.
Total area, then volume over the length of the seam.
| Component | Calculation | Area (mm²) |
|---|---|---|
| Two V grooves | 2 × 8.5² × tan 30° | 83.4 |
| Root gap | 3 × 20 | 60.0 |
| Caps, both sides | 2 × ⅔ × 12.8 × 1.5 | 25.6 |
| Total | 169.0 |
Mass of deposited weld metal.
Arc time at the stated deposition rate.
Elapsed time.
The operating factor is the fraction of the shift the arc is actually burning — the rest is positioning, changing electrodes, cleaning slag, waiting for a crane. At 40 %, a two-and-a-half hour weld occupies most of a shift.
This is why edge preparation is an economic decision as well as a metallurgical one.
Cut the included angle from 60° to 45° and the V area falls by roughly a third, taking consumable cost, arc time and distortion with it — provided the process can still reach the root.
Answer15.9 kg of weld metal, 2.65 h of arc time, about 6.6 h elapsed
The trap: quoting arc time as if it were the time the job takes. Operating factor is typically 25–45 % for manual processes and it is what turns a welding estimate into a production schedule.
Twenty-six questions in three bands. The first is what a campus interviewer or a GATE viva panel asks; the second is a design office or production role; the third is quality control, inspection and class survey. Read the question, answer it out loud, then open the answer — recognition is not the same as being able to say it.
Welding fuses the parent metals: the joint reaches melting point and the two pieces become one continuous piece of metal, usually with filler of similar composition. Brazing and soldering do not melt the parent metal at all — a lower-melting filler is drawn into the joint by capillary action and bonds to the surfaces. The dividing line between brazing and soldering is 450 °C: above it is brazing, below it is soldering. The practical consequence is that a welded joint can be as strong as the parent metal, while a brazed or soldered joint is limited by the filler.
Weight and watertightness, mostly. A riveted joint needs overlapping plates and a row of holes, so it is heavier and every hole is a stress raiser; a welded butt joint is flush and continuous. Welding is also faster, cheaper, better suited to prefabrication in blocks, and gives a smoother hull. The cost of that continuity is that a crack has an uninterrupted path — a riveted seam arrests a crack at the joint, a welded one does not, which is exactly what the early all-welded ship failures demonstrated and why brittle crack arrest is now a design requirement on large container ships.
The HAZ is the parent metal close to the weld that never melted but was hot enough for its microstructure to change. It is not one thing: nearest the fusion line the grains coarsen, further out the steel is normalised and refined, further still it is only tempered. Coarse-grained HAZ is the problem region — it is typically the lowest-toughness part of the joint and where brittle fracture and hydrogen cracks start. Its width and severity are controlled by heat input and cooling rate, which is why heat input is a qualified variable rather than a matter of preference.
Heat input governs the cooling rate, and cooling rate governs the microstructure. High heat input cools slowly, giving a wide HAZ with coarse grain and lower toughness. Low heat input cools quickly, giving a hard, brittle martensitic HAZ that is vulnerable to hydrogen cracking. The formula is Q = η·V·I/v, where η is the thermal efficiency of the process, and the answer is expressed in kJ/mm or kJ/cm. In practice the parameter a welder can most easily change without noticing is travel speed — and it sits in the denominator.
Preheat slows the cooling rate after welding, which does three things: it avoids a hard martensitic HAZ, it gives dissolved hydrogen time to diffuse out, and it reduces residual stress. The temperature required depends on the carbon equivalent of the steel, the combined thickness at the joint, the hydrogen level of the consumable, and the restraint. Thicker sections need more because they draw heat away in three dimensions. On board and in the yard the practical rule is that preheat is specified on the WPS and checked before the arc is struck, not judged by hand.
Also called cold cracking or delayed cracking, because it can appear hours or days after welding. It needs four things at once, and removing any one prevents it: hydrogen in the weld metal, a susceptible microstructure (hard martensitic HAZ), tensile stress (residual or applied), and a temperature below about 150 °C. The controls map onto the four: low-hydrogen consumables properly baked and stored, preheat and controlled heat input, reduced restraint and good sequence, and post-weld hydrogen release where required. Because it is delayed, final NDT on higher strength steel is deliberately held back — UR W28 ties that delay to the yield strength of the steel.
The leg is the length along the fusion face — what you measure with a gauge on the plate. The throat is the shortest distance from the root to the face of the weld, and it is the dimension that carries the load. For an equal-leg fillet the design throat is the leg divided by √2, about 0.7 of the leg. Drawings and rules may specify either, so the first question on any fillet dimension is which one is meant: an 8 mm throat is a much larger weld than an 8 mm leg.
Dilution is the proportion of the weld metal that came from the melted parent metal rather than from the filler. It matters whenever the two have different compositions — welding a clad plate, joining dissimilar steels, or overlaying a corrosion-resistant layer, where too much dilution pulls the deposit out of specification. Dilution rises with heat input and with processes that penetrate deeply, such as submerged arc, and falls with stringer beads and lower current.
Four, and each has a natural home. SAW welds panel butts and long seams flat in the panel line, where its very high deposition rate pays. FCAW does most positional work on blocks and at erection joints, because it welds out of position with high deposition and a slag that supports the pool. GMAW handles thinner material and robotic fillet welding. SMAW survives for repairs, tack welds, awkward access and anywhere a cable and a rod beat a wire feeder. GTAW is reserved for root runs on pipework and for stainless and aluminium, where quality matters more than speed. One-sided welding with ceramic or flux backing is now standard on panel lines because it removes the need to turn the panel over.
SAW works under a blanket of granular flux, which is held in place by gravity. Turn the joint out of the flat or near-flat position and the flux falls off, taking the shielding, the slag cover and the arc stability with it. In exchange for that restriction it offers deposition rates several times those of manual processes, deep penetration, no arc flash and no visible arc — which is why the panel line is built around it and the blocks are turned to suit rather than the other way around.
Flux cored arc welding uses a tubular wire filled with flux instead of a solid wire. It combines the continuous feed and high deposition rate of a wire process with the slag of a covered electrode, and that slag is what supports the molten pool in vertical and overhead positions. Rutile cored wires are easy to run positionally; basic cored wires give better toughness and lower hydrogen where the steel demands it. Self-shielded variants avoid a gas bottle and tolerate draughts, which matters on an open berth.
Thickness, access, process and cost. Below about 6 mm a square edge with a root gap will do. Above that a single-V opens the joint enough for the arc to reach the root. Beyond roughly 20 mm a double-V halves the weld metal and lets the joint be balanced about the neutral axis to control angular distortion — but it needs access from both sides. A U or double-U preparation costs machining but removes still more weld metal on very thick sections. Every degree of included angle is consumable, arc time and distortion, so the preparation is chosen as the smallest opening the process can reliably fill from the root.
Weld metal shrinks as it cools. In a fillet or a single-V butt the weld sits on one side of the neutral axis of the joint, so the shrinkage pulls that side in and the plate rotates. Controls, in order of preference: balance the weld about the neutral axis with a double-V or welding alternately either side; pre-set the plates so the shrinkage pulls them into line; use the smallest weld that satisfies the rules; sequence with back-step or skip welding; and use restraint or strongbacks — which trade distortion for residual stress, so they are a last resort rather than a first one. Straightening afterwards by line heating is common, expensive, and something a good sequence avoids.
Both spread heat rather than concentrating it. In back-step welding the seam is divided into short lengths, each run in the direction opposite to the overall progression, so shrinkage in one length is partly resisted by the already-cooled metal beside it. Skip welding deposits short runs at intervals along the joint and then fills the gaps. Both reduce cumulative longitudinal shrinkage and angular distortion on long seams, at the cost of more starts and stops — and every start and stop is a potential defect, which is the trade-off.
A step-like tear that opens beneath the surface of a plate, parallel to the rolled surface, when a weld applies high tensile stress through the thickness of that plate — typically at a T or corner joint under restraint. The cause is elongated non-metallic inclusions in the rolling plane, so the plate has much lower ductility through its thickness than along it. Prevention: specify a through-thickness tested plate (Z quality, covered by IACS UR W14), redesign the joint so the load runs in the rolling plane, reduce restraint, butter the surface with a lower-strength weld metal, or reduce the weld volume.
Because fatigue crack growth in steel is almost independent of yield strength. Higher strength buys thinner scantlings for the same static capacity, which means higher working stresses, a more flexible structure and a higher stress range at every detail — while the fatigue resistance of the welded joint has not improved at all. So the same detail that was comfortable in mild steel may not be, and hatch corners, bracket toes and weld terminations need better geometry and finish rather than less.
A pWPS is the preliminary welding procedure specification — the proposed recipe, written before anything is proved. A test weld is made to that recipe, tested, and the results recorded in a PQR, the procedure qualification record: what was actually done and what the tests gave. If the results pass, the recipe is issued as an approved WPS, which is what the welder works to. The essential variables — process, steel grade, thickness range, position, consumable, heat input range, preheat — define how far the qualification stretches. Move outside any of them and the WPS no longer covers the joint.
Under IACS UR W28 the test assembly is first examined non-destructively over its full length — visual, surface crack detection by dye penetrant or magnetic particle, and volumetric examination by radiography or ultrasonics. It is then cut up for destructive tests: two transverse tensile specimens, four bend specimens (two root and two face, or four side bends on thicker material), Charpy V-notch impact specimens at defined notch positions across the weld and HAZ at the specified temperature, one macro examination, and hardness testing for steels of 355 N/mm² yield and above. A longitudinal tensile test is added when the consumable is not separately approved.
Procedure qualification proves the recipe; welder qualification proves the person can follow it. IACS UR W32 sets the qualification scheme for welders of hull structural steels — a test weld in a defined position and material group, examined and tested, giving an approval with its own range of validity for position, thickness, joint type and process. Approvals lapse if the welder stops using the process, so continuity of employment records matter as much as the original certificate. In a yard audit, the two questions are always the same: is there an approved WPS for this joint, and is the person welding it qualified for that WPS?
IACS UR W33 covers NDT of ship hull steel welds and UR W34 the advanced techniques — phased array and time-of-flight diffraction.
On thick sections and wherever the expected defect is planar. UT detects lack of fusion and cracks — flaws that are dangerous precisely because they are sharp — far more reliably than RT, which can miss a tight crack lying parallel to the beam. UT also needs access from one side only, gives depth information, produces no radiation hazard so work can continue nearby, and is not limited by thickness in the way film radiography is. RT keeps its place where a permanent image is wanted and where the likely defects are volumetric.
In practice, IACS Recommendation No. 47, the Shipbuilding and Repair Quality Standard, which is the reference most yards and owners write into the building contract. It gives standard and limit values for fabrication and welding — alignment, gaps, undercut depth, weld profile, distortion, straightness — for both new construction and repair. It is a recommendation rather than a unified requirement, so its force comes from the contract; the current edition is Rev.10 with a corrigendum issued in October 2025.
A running brittle crack in a welded hull can travel the length of a ship, because welding makes the structure continuous. The risk grew as container ships adopted very thick, high-strength deck plating, where a crack initiating at a hatch corner or a weld could propagate catastrophically. The response was to require steels with a demonstrated crack arrest capability and to design arrest features into the structure, so that a crack that does start is stopped within a plate rather than crossing the ship. IACS UR W31 covers YP47 steels and brittle crack arrest steels.
Heat input above roughly 50 kJ/cm — and above about 35 kJ/cm for quenched and tempered steels of 420 N/mm² yield and above. It matters because very high heat input coarsens the HAZ and can cost toughness in exactly the material chosen for its toughness. IACS completely revised UR W28 to Rev.3 in September 2025, aligning the treatment of high heat input welding across W11, W16 and W28 with ISO 15614-1 and AWS D1.1, adding explicit definitions in kJ/cm, widening the qualification requirements, and tying the timing of final NDT to the yield strength of the steel. The revision applies to new welding procedure qualification tests from 1 January 2027.
Establish what the indication actually is and where — method, size, depth, orientation — and compare it against the acceptance criteria that apply to this joint, because an indication is not automatically a defect. If it is rejectable, stop and ask why before repairing: one isolated pore in a long seam is a different problem from lack of fusion appearing repeatedly on the same shift. Check whether the joint was welded to an approved WPS by a qualified welder, and whether anything drifted — consumable storage, gas, preheat, travel speed. Then repair to an approved repair procedure, re-examine by the same method plus surface crack detection, and record it. Finally close the loop: extend the examination to adjacent joints from the same welder or shift if a systematic cause is suspected.
Q = η·V·I/vHeat input; η ≈ 0.8 SMAW/FCAW, 1.0 SAW, 0.6 GTAWHigh heat input > 50 kJ/cm> 35 kJ/cm for QT steels of 420 N/mm² and aboveThroat a = 0.7 × leg zFor an equal-leg filletWeld volume ∝ z²Doubling the leg quadruples the metal, time and distortionCEV = C + Mn/6 + (Cr+Mo+V)/5 + (Ni+Cu)/15Higher CEV ⇒ more preheatCold cracking needs 4 thingsHydrogen + hard HAZ + tensile stress + below ~150 °CpWPS → test → PQR → WPSEssential variables set the range of approvalSurface: VT, MT, PTInternal: UT (planar), RT (volumetric), PAUT/TOFDW28 procedure, W32 welderW33 NDT, W34 advanced NDTRec 47Shipbuilding and Repair Quality Standard — the workmanship tolerances