Grounding, salvage, SAR and spillage rarely arrive one at a time; a chief mate who has drilled the sequence for each keeps a single emergency from becoming three.
The instinct after a grounding, collision or reported flooding is to do something — engines astern, pumps started, ballast shifted. That instinct has to be suppressed for the few minutes it takes to find out what you are actually dealing with. A ship that has just taken damage is, for the moment, a system in an unknown state: you do not know the full extent of the flooding, whether the hull is still supporting the load it was designed for, or how much reserve stability is left. Acting before you know these things risks converting a survivable casualty into an unsurvivable one.
You cannot out-think a grounding or a flooding casualty with reflexes. The ship is safer for the few minutes soundings and a stability calculation take than for an engine movement made before anyone knows what is under the hull or how much freeboard is actually left.
Only once the picture is established does the conversation move to what to do about it — and even then, the first decision is usually whether to do anything at all in the next few minutes, or to hold position, inform the company, and keep gathering information while the situation is stable.
A grounded ship is, in effect, partly supported by two things at once: buoyancy, as always, and a reaction force from the seabed at the point of contact. That second force — commonly called the ground reaction — is the reason a grounding is not simply "run aground, refloat when possible." As long as the ground is carrying part of the ship's weight, the ship's behaviour changes in ways that mirror dry-docking, and the size of that effect has to be quantified before anyone touches the engines or the ballast.
The rise in the observed mean draft after grounding, multiplied by the tonnes-per- centimetre immersion, gives a working estimate of the ground reaction, P. As P grows, the ship's effective KG rises and GM is virtually reduced, exactly as it is during the critical stages of dry-docking — except here the process is running in reverse, uncontrolled, and often on a falling tide that is making P larger by the minute.
As the ground reaction grows, GM does not stay where it was. The ship you refloat may be measurably less stable than the one that grounded, which is exactly why the residual stability calculation has to be done before, not after, any attempt to move.
The state of the tide governs the timing. On a falling tide, P will keep increasing until low water; lightening ship in a hurry can deepen the contact or destabilise a ship whose GM is already reduced, and is rarely the right first move. The usual sequence is to complete soundings and the stability and strength calculation, notify the company, and let the flood tide start reducing P on its own — moving only once the numbers, not the calendar, say it is safe to.
Once a casualty is beyond what the ship's own crew can safely resolve, salvage becomes a commercial and legal question as much as a technical one. Lloyd's Open Form (LOF) is the standard vehicle: it is agreed on the principle of "no cure, no pay" — the salvor is paid only if the attempt succeeds, with the amount, if not agreed, fixed by arbitration against the value of the property saved. That structure gives the salvor every incentive to succeed, but none at all to spend money protecting the environment if doing so does not also help save the ship or cargo.
SCOPIC exists to close that gap. It is invoked alongside an LOF and pays the salvor for agreed environmental protection work at a fixed tariff, independent of the salved value — so a marginal casualty with a serious pollution risk still gets a properly resourced response, rather than one scaled to what the hull and cargo happen to be worth.
LOF pays for success; SCOPIC pays for environmental effort regardless of it. Between them they explain why a salvor will fight hard for a ship worth saving and still turn up properly equipped for one that barely is.
Most ships that take part in a rescue at sea do so as an assisting vessel responding to someone else's distress, not as the casualty. The role has a defined shape, and knowing it cold matters, because there is rarely time to work it out from first principles once the call comes in.
IAMSAR Volume III is carried specifically for this role. It sets out what an assisting vessel does at each stage, so the response is a rehearsed sequence rather than an improvisation under pressure.
Being on scene coordinator is not a title, it is a job: keeping track of which units are searching where, relaying reports to the RCC, and directing effort as conditions or new information change — a responsibility that continues until the RCC or a relieving unit takes it over, not until the immediate excitement of arrival has passed.
A pollution incident is managed in a fixed order, and the order matters as much as the actions themselves. Stop the source first — close the valve, isolate the line, halt the cargo or bunker transfer — because containment and clean-up on deck are wasted effort while oil is still being added to the problem. Only once the source is stopped does attention shift to containing what has already escaped.
The Shipboard Oil Pollution Emergency Plan (SOPEP), or its equivalent for other harmful substances, exists to make that response a checklist rather than an improvisation: it sets out the equipment on board, who does what, and — critically — exactly who has to be told and in what order.
The same notification logic extends to any serious casualty, not only pollution: a grounding, collision or major machinery failure is reported up several channels at once — the flag state and, where relevant, the coastal state for their statutory interest, the company and the classification society for the technical and certification consequences, and the P&I club for the commercial and liability side. Each has a different reason to be told, which is why none of them can be treated as covered by having told one of the others.
Write the timeline as it happens — soundings taken, calls made, decisions reached and why — not from memory afterwards. It is the record an inquiry, an insurer, and the ship's own defence will all work from, and a reconstructed log is worth far less than a contemporaneous one.
Two scenario walkthroughs: a grounding where the ground reaction has to be quantified before any refloating decision, and a search-and-rescue response where reporting and preparation matter as much as the passage itself.
A 24,500 t product tanker touches a falling tide on a sand-and-mud bank while transiting a buoyed channel. Engines are stopped immediately. The even-keel mean draft immediately before contact was 8.20 m, and the deck log gives TPC = 20.0 t/cm. Twenty minutes after grounding, soundings confirm the ship is aground amidships, the mean draft now reads 8.05 m, and a list of 3° to starboard has come on. Low water is in two hours, after which the tide will start to flood. As chief mate, how do you proceed?
Displacement immediately before grounding, W = 24,500 t TPC = 20.0 t/cm Mean draft before contact = 8.20 m; mean draft after settling = 8.05 m List after grounding = 3° to starboard Tide: falling, flood due to start in 2 hours
First, resist the instinct to work the engines off.
A grounded ship with undetermined damage may, for the moment, be held together by the ground itself. Astern power before the extent of flooding and the residual strength are known can open the hull further, or swing the stern into deeper water while the bow stays fast, straining the structure at the point of contact.
Sound every tank, void and bilge round the whole ship.
Not only those near amidships where contact is suspected, since shock can crack tanks some distance from the point of impact. In parallel, quantify how much of the ship's weight the ground is now carrying: the rise in the mean draft reading is the direct evidence of it.
300 t is a modest fraction of 24,500 t displacement.
But its effect on stability is not proportional to that fraction. With part of the ship's weight now supported at the point of contact instead of by buoyancy, the ship behaves as though partly dry-docked: the effective KG rises and GM is virtually reduced for as long as the ground reaction exists. The starboard list is consistent with a contact point off the centreline, to be confirmed against the sounding results.
Decide on the tide, not on impatience.
With two hours of ebb still to run, the ground reaction will increase before it falls — so this is not the moment to lighten cargo or ballast in the hope of easing off; that could deepen the contact or further destabilise a ship whose GM is already reduced. The safer sequence is to complete the damage assessment and the residual stability and strength calculation now, so the ship is ready to act the moment the flood tide starts reducing the ground reaction on its own.
AnswerSound the whole ship, confirm the ground reaction is about 300 t and its likely position from the list, hold engines and ballast, complete the damage-stability and residual-strength calculation, notify the company and the coastal authority, and do not attempt to move until the calculation shows positive residual GM and adequate freeboard to the margin line — timed, ideally, to the rising tide.
The trap: reading the reduced draft as "300 tonnes lighter" and treating that as good news — it is 300 tonnes the ground is carrying instead of the sea, and every tonne of it is degrading GM for as long as the ship stays aground.
Your container ship, on passage at 18.0 kn, receives a MAYDAY relay from the coastal RCC at 0410 UTC: a fishing vessel with six persons on board is taking on water 42 nautical miles from your position, and no other vessel has yet reported in the area. As chief mate on watch, what do you do, and when do you expect to arrive?
Relay received: 0410 UTC Distance to distress position = 42 nautical miles Ship's speed made good = 18.0 knots Persons on board the casualty vessel = 6 No other unit yet reported on scene
Acknowledge and commit.
A MAYDAY relay carries the same duty to assist as a MAYDAY received directly, unless the master judges that proceeding would gravely endanger this ship, or is told a better-placed vessel is already responding — neither applies here. Acknowledge to the RCC, alter course for the distress position, and bring the ship up to maximum safe speed.
Work out when you will arrive.
So the RCC and any other responders can plan around it.
Report the ETA to the RCC.
Together with your intentions, and use the time to prepare rather than simply steam. Post an additional lookout forward, muster and brief the rescue boat crew and the medical team, rig a pilot ladder and scrambling net on the lee side, and have heaving lines and recovery strops ready — do this now, not on arrival.
Decide the coordination question before you arrive, not after.
With no other unit yet on scene, IAMSAR Volume III anticipates that the first capable vessel to arrive may be tasked by the RCC as on-scene coordinator, directing any further units that join. If another vessel or a SAR aircraft is already coordinating when you get there, you fall in under its instructions instead of running your own approach or search pattern.
AnswerAcknowledge, proceed at full safe speed, report ETA 0630 UTC to the RCC, prepare recovery and medical arrangements en route, and either assume on-scene coordination if tasked and no one else is coordinating, or operate strictly under the existing coordinator's instructions on arrival.
The trap: treating the job as finished once the ETA is reported — the obligation continues through recovery and stops only when the RCC or the on-scene coordinator releases you, not when you feel you have done your bit.
P = TPC × rise in mean draft (cm)Ground reaction tonnage — treat as weight removed from the keelResidual GM, range, freeboard to margin lineConfirm all three positive before any refloating attemptLOF — no cure, no paySalved value in dispute goes to arbitration; master may sign for ownersSCOPICFixed tariff for environmental salvage, payable regardless of salved valueIAMSAR Volume IIIAssisting-vessel actions: acknowledge, proceed, report ETA, prepare, follow OSCOn-scene coordinatorFirst capable vessel may be tasked; coordinates all SAR units presentSOPEP / SMPEPPlan, equipment list, contacts, and the reporting sequence for a spillCasualty report chainFlag state, coastal state, company, classification society, P&I clubEmergency towing arrangementFitted fore and aft on larger tankers; ready for rapid deploymentContemporaneous timelineWritten as events happen; the primary record for any inquiry