The generators, the cables and the breakers on a ship all trace back to one document — the load list — and reviewing a marine electrical design means being able to follow that chain the way the engineer who built it did.
Every marine electrical design starts from a load list, and it stays the reference document for the vessel's life — every generator, cable and switchboard section traces back to a line on it. Each item carries a connected rating (its nameplate kW), a duty type (continuous, intermittent, or standby), and a load factor for each operating condition the ship runs in. The load factor captures the fact that a steering gear motor, say, does not run at full rated power continuously even while it is switched on — it cycles, and its average draw over the condition is a fraction of its nameplate figure.
The list is built and summed separately for each operating condition — sea-going, harbour/cargo work, manoeuvring, and emergency — because the mix of running equipment is different in each, and one condition will turn out to set the worst-case absorbed demand. It is that worst-case absorbed figure, not the sum of every nameplate rating on the ship, that generators are sized against; summing connected ratings assumes everything runs flat out simultaneously, which never happens and would produce a plant many times larger than the ship needs.
The load list is the actual design decision. Get the duty, the load factor and the operating condition wrong on a handful of large consumers and every downstream calculation — generator size, cable size, switchboard rating — inherits that error and still looks internally consistent.
A well-built load list also records diversity between similar consumers (not every pump on a common header runs together) and leaves room for equipment added later in the ship's life, which is carried forward as an explicit growth margin rather than folded invisibly into individual load factors.
Once the worst-case absorbed demand and its growth margin are known, the next decision is how many generating sets to fit and what size each one should be. The usual philosophy is n+1: enough duty sets to cover the design demand between them, plus one further identical set on automatic stand-by, so that the failure or planned maintenance of any single generator still leaves the ship able to run essential services — with non-essential load shed automatically rather than left for an operator to notice and act on.
Sizing is not simply a matter of picking the smallest set that covers the demand. Diesel generators are designed to run best within a continuous loading band, typically from around half to a little over four-fifths of their rated output; run persistently lighter than that and unburnt fuel and carbon build up in the exhaust and cylinders (commonly called wet-stacking), while running at or above the rated output for long periods shortens the overhaul interval. The duty arrangement is chosen so the normal running load sits comfortably in that band, with enough spare capacity to start the largest motor on the board without an unacceptable voltage or frequency dip.
Marine distribution is almost always radial: power flows outward from the main switchboard through distribution boards to final circuits, with no ring or mesh to complicate fault-finding. What survivability the arrangement has comes instead from splitting the main switchboard itself into two (or more) sections joined by a bus-tie breaker, each section fed by its own generators where practicable and each capable of carrying the essential load of the whole ship on its own if the tie is opened. A fault or fire confined to one switchboard section then costs half the plant, not all of it.
From the main board, feeders run to sub-distribution boards serving groups of consumers by area or function — engine room services, deck machinery, accommodation, navigation — rather than every final circuit being wired directly back to the main board. This keeps individual feeder lengths and fault levels manageable and lets a whole functional group be isolated for maintenance without touching unrelated services.
Within each board, circuits are explicitly split into essential and non-essential categories, because that split is what the automatic load-shedding scheme acts on when a generator is lost or overloaded: non-essential feeders (typically domestic and hotel loads, or non-critical HVAC) are tripped first and automatically, well before the remaining generating capacity is threatened. Voltage levels are chosen to suit plant size — low-voltage distribution (commonly in the few hundred volt three-phase range) covers most ships, with higher voltage distribution reserved for vessels with large propulsion or thruster loads, where LV cable sizes and switchgear would otherwise become unwieldy.
A cable is checked three separate ways, and whichever check demands the largest conductor is the one that decides the cable actually installed — checking only the first of the three is the most common error an inexperienced designer makes.
Cable tables quote ampacity at reference conditions — typically a single cable in free air at a moderate ambient. Real installations depart from that reference in two ways that both reduce how much current the cable can safely carry: a hotter ambient (an engine room, or a duct run near hot machinery) reduces the temperature margin to the insulation's limit, and running several loaded cables together in a bunch or tray reduces how effectively each one sheds heat to its surroundings. Both factors are applied as multiplying derating factors against the table figure, and both must be included — omitting the grouping factor because a run "looks like" a single cable in a duct full of others is a frequent oversight.
Volt drop is checked separately, using the actual load current over the real route length, and is commonly limited to a few percent (typically of the order of 6%) from the switchboard to the load. The concern is not the cable's safety but the equipment at the far end: a motor starting against a sagging supply develops less torque than its nameplate promises, and control gear, contactors and electronic equipment can misbehave or drop out below their rated voltage. A long, lightly loaded run can pass its current check comfortably and still fail on volt drop, particularly to consumers at the extremities of the ship.
Finally, the conductor must survive the fault energy it will see before its protective device clears — a short-circuit withstand check against the let-through energy of the upstream breaker or fuse, which is why protection settings and cable size are not independent decisions.
A ship's distribution system is protected in layers — final circuit breaker, sub-board incomer, main switchboard breaker, generator breaker — and discrimination is the requirement that a fault anywhere in that chain is cleared by the single device nearest to it, leaving everything upstream undisturbed. Lose discrimination and a fault on one feeder can trip several layers of breakers together, turning a localised problem into a much larger blackout than the fault itself ever justified.
Discrimination is achieved two ways together, not one: time grading and current grading. Time grading staggers the delay settings of successive devices moving upstream, so the nearest device has the shortest delay (or none at all — an instantaneous trip) and each device further back waits longer, giving the one closer to the fault the first chance to clear it. Current grading sets the pickup thresholds so that an upstream device's instantaneous element, if it has one, only operates for fault levels genuinely beyond what any downstream device is expected to clear — an instantaneous element on an intermediate breaker set below a fault current that a downstream breaker can also see will race that downstream breaker rather than back it up.
Every breaker and fuse in the chain must also be individually rated to interrupt the maximum prospective fault current at its own location — grading decides which device operates, but each device still has to be physically capable of clearing the fault it is graded to catch.
Because grading intervals accumulate moving back toward the generator, the plant's short-circuit withstand — how long the generator and its cabling can carry full fault current before damage — has to be checked against the worst-case total clearing time the grading scheme produces, not just against the fastest device's setting.
Most marine low-voltage distribution is deliberately insulated from the hull rather than solidly earthed, the reverse of common shore practice. In an insulated (IT) system, a single fault from one phase to the steel hull does not by itself create a short-circuit path, because the system has no intentional connection to earth for fault current to complete through; instead, an insulation-monitoring device detects the drop in insulation resistance and raises an alarm, and supply continues uninterrupted. That is the entire point of the arrangement at sea: a single earth fault, found on a vessel with no shore standby supply to switch to, must not itself cause a blackout.
The alarm is not the end of the matter, though — it is a warning that the system's protection against a second, more serious event has already been used up. If a second fault develops on a different phase before the first is traced and cleared, current can now flow phase-to-phase through the hull structure itself, and that is a genuine short circuit. Crews are trained, and watchkeeping procedures written, around finding and clearing the first fault promptly rather than treating the alarm as low priority because nothing has tripped.
Emergency power exists for the same underlying reason — normal generation can fail entirely, and essential services (steering, navigation lighting, fire pumps, communications, emergency lighting) cannot wait for it to be restored. An emergency generator, located and protected independently of the main machinery space, is arranged to start and pick up its load automatically within a short time of a blackout — commonly on the order of tens of seconds — and is sized to run the essential load list for a stated period of autonomy that scales with the type of ship and whether passengers are carried.
Shore connection is the other point where the ship's philosophy meets a different system: shore supply may differ in voltage, frequency or earthing arrangement from the ship's own, so a galvanic isolating transformer is normally fitted to keep the ship's insulated system genuinely isolated from shore earth, and phase sequence and synchronising checks are made before the ship's own generators are paralleled with, or handed over to, the shore feed.
The three examples below follow the chapter in order — sizing the generating plant from the load list, sizing a feeder cable against all three governing checks, and grading protection so a fault discriminates correctly — each with the full reasoning and every figure shown.
A 6000 GT general cargo ship's sea-going electrical load list is given below. Using the absorbed loads and a 20% growth margin, determine the design electrical demand, select a duty generator arrangement built from standard 100 kW sets run in parallel, check the loading of each duty unit, and state how much non-essential load must be shed automatically if one duty generator trips while the vessel is at sea.
Sea-going load list (connected rating and load factor): Auxiliary machinery pumps — 50 kW, load factor 0.80 Steering gear — 20 kW, load factor 0.25 Navigation & communications — 10 kW, load factor 1.00 HVAC / air-conditioning plant — 60 kW, load factor 0.50 Galley — 40 kW, load factor 0.50 Lighting — 20 kW, load factor 1.00 Growth margin = 20%; standard generator set rating = 100 kW
Separate connected rating from absorbed load.
| Load | Rating (kW) | Load factor | Absorbed (kW) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aux. machinery pumps | 50 | 0.80 | 40 |
| Steering gear | 20 | 0.25 | 5 |
| Navigation & comms | 10 | 1.00 | 10 |
| HVAC / AC plant | 60 | 0.50 | 30 |
| Galley | 40 | 0.50 | 20 |
| Lighting | 20 | 1.00 | 20 |
| Total | 200 | — | 125 |
Each item on the list only draws its rated kW for the fraction of time given by its load factor in this condition, so the absorbed load is rating × load factor, not the nameplate rating.
Add a margin for load growth before sizing plant.
The load list is a snapshot of the design; equipment gets added over a ship's life, so the growth margin is applied to the absorbed figure, not to the much larger connected figure.
Choose the number and size of duty generators.
Two 100 kW sets run in parallel at sea share the 150 kW demand equally, with a third identical set held on automatic stand-by — an n+1 arrangement.
Check what happens if a duty generator is lost.
With only one 100 kW set left on the board, the full 150 kW sea-going demand cannot be carried — the shortfall must be found automatically by shedding non-essential load, not by an operator watching a trend.
AnswerDesign demand 150 kW → two 100 kW generators run in parallel at 75% load each, with a third 100 kW set on stand-by; automatic load-shedding of HVAC and galley (50 kW total) protects the board if a duty generator is lost at sea.
The trap: sizing the generators on the 200 kW connected total instead of the diversified-plus-margin figure of 150 kW — it looks conservative but actually hides the real single-failure shortfall behind an oversized nameplate rating, so the load-shedding scheme never gets designed at all.
A 415 V three-phase feeder runs 120 m from the main switchboard to a 22 kW deck-machinery motor whose nameplate full-load current is 36 A. The cable is installed in an engine room at 45°C ambient, grouped touching two other loaded cables. Using the manufacturer's cable table below, select the smallest cable that satisfies both the current rating and a 6% volt-drop limit.
Cable table (copper, 3-core, XLPE): 6 mm² — base rating 50 A in air at 30°C, single cable; volt-drop factor 7.5 mV/A/m 10 mm² — base rating 68 A in air at 30°C, single cable; volt-drop factor 4.4 mV/A/m Ambient temperature (45°C) derating factor = 0.90 Grouping derating factor (three loaded cables bunched) = 0.80 Volt-drop limit = 6% of 415 V
Combine the rating-table derating factors.
The tabulated ampacity applies at a 30°C reference with a single cable in free air; both departures from that reference reduce how much current the cable can actually carry, and the factors are multiplied, not added.
Find the base-condition ampacity the cable needs.
Divide the real load current by the combined derating factor to see what rating the cable would need at table (reference) conditions to still carry 36 A once installed hot and grouped.
Select on current alone.
The 6 mm² cable's base rating of 50 A exactly meets this, so current capacity by itself would pick the 6 mm² cable.
Now check volt drop for the 6 mm² cable.
The check current sizing skips. Volt drop uses the actual load current (36 A), not the derated capacity, over the real cable length.
7.8% exceeds the 6% limit, so the 6 mm² cable fails even though it passed on current.
Volt drop governs. Find the largest volt-drop factor that would satisfy 6% over this run, then pick the next cable size that meets it.
Answer10 mm² cable is required. Its current rating (68 A base, well above the 50 A needed) is more than adequate, but it is the volt-drop check, not the ampacity check, that actually governs the selection at 4.6% against the 6% limit.
The trap: stopping at the current-rating check because the smaller cable 'passes the table' — volt drop and short-circuit withstand are checked on the same run, and the largest cable size any single criterion demands is the one that gets installed.
A three-phase short circuit of 4.0 kA occurs on the galley sub-distribution board. Three protective devices are in series between the fault and the generator: the galley board's final MCCB (100 A rated, instantaneous element set at 6× rated current), the distribution board's incomer breaker (250 A rated, instantaneous element set at 8× rated current, with a short-time delay also available), and the generator's main breaker (short-time delay available). The generator can withstand full fault current for 2 s. Check whether discrimination holds as currently set, and if not, propose a time-graded scheme that restores it.
Fault current at galley board = 4.0 kA Final MCCB: 100 A rated, instantaneous pickup = 6 × rated Distribution incomer: 250 A rated, instantaneous pickup = 8 × rated Generator short-circuit thermal withstand = 2 s Final MCCB total clearing time (instantaneous) = 0.03 s
Check whether discrimination holds as currently set, and if not, propose a time-graded scheme that restores it
Find the final MCCB's instantaneous pickup and confirm it clears the fault.
Now check the distribution incomer's instantaneous pickup against the same fault.
Being in series with the final breaker, the incomer sees the identical 4.0 kA — not a reduced value.
This is a discrimination failure, not a safety margin.
Both the final MCCB and the distribution incomer see a fault current above their own instantaneous pickup, so both can trip within a breaker cycle of each other — a galley board fault would black out the whole distribution board instead of clearing locally.
Restore discrimination by removing the instantaneous element from the intermediate breaker.
Block the incomer's instantaneous trip for this feeder and let it clear on a delayed short-time element instead, graded above the final breaker's clearing time; grade the generator breaker above the incomer in the same way.
Check the worst case against the generator's thermal withstand.
If both downstream devices somehow fail to clear, the generator breaker is the last line of defence, opening at its own delayed setting.
AnswerAs set, the scheme is not discriminative — the incomer's instantaneous pickup of 2.0 kA sits below the 4.0 kA fault. Blocking the incomer's instantaneous element and grading time delays 0.03 s → 0.40 s → 0.80 s restores discrimination, and even the worst-case 0.80 s clearance stays well inside the generator's 2 s withstand.
The trap: assuming an instantaneous element on every breaker makes protection faster and therefore safer — an instantaneous element on an intermediate breaker only helps discrimination if its pickup is set above every fault current it can see downstream; set below that, it defeats discrimination and turns a local fault into a wider blackout.
P = √3·V_L·I_L·cos φReal power, balanced three-phase loadS = √3·V_L·I_LApparent power (kVA) — generator nameplate basisAbsorbed load = Σ(rating × load factor)Per operating condition, not connected loadDesign demand = absorbed × (1 + growth margin)Typically 10–20% before generator selectionCable check 1 — currentTabulated ampacity × ambient factor × grouping factor ≥ load currentCable check 2 — volt dropVD = mV/A/m × I × L ÷ 1000; limit commonly 6%, switchboard to loadCable check 3 — short-circuit withstandConductor survives fault let-through energy until protection clearsDiscriminationNearest device to the fault clears first — grade by time and current togetherInsulated (IT) neutralFirst earth fault → alarm only; clear it before a second fault short-circuits through the hull